Bovine Leather Removed from the EUDR: What Changes
By Emilio Muela Pérez · COO/CFO and co-founder of Coolx
Published on September 23, 2026

Bovine hides and skins are out of the scope of the EUDR. Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/2102, published in the Official Journal on 17 September 2026, deletes from Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 the three headings that covered bovine leather: ex 4101, ex 4104 and ex 4107.
The change entered into force the day after publication, on 18 September 2026, with no transition period. In plain terms: companies importing raw, tanned, crust or finished bovine hides and skins into the European Union no longer need to file a due diligence statement for those products.
📊 The essentials in three figures
- Three headings leave Annex I: ex 4101, ex 4104 and ex 4107, all bovine.
- Applicable from 18 September 2026, with no transition period and no bridging regime.
- The cattle sector is not out: the same act widens live animals and adds frozen tongues from 30 December 2027.
Which leather headings leave EUDR Annex I
| CN code | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| ex 4101 | Raw hides and skins of bovine animals (fresh, or salted, dried, limed, pickled or otherwise preserved, but not tanned), whether or not dehaired or split | Deleted |
| ex 4104 | Tanned or crust hides and skins of bovine animals, without hair on, whether or not split, but not further prepared | Deleted |
| ex 4107 | Leather further prepared after tanning or crusting, and parchment-dressed leather, of bovine animals, without hair on, whether or not split, other than leather of heading 4114 | Deleted |
Heading 4114 was already outside Annex I and stays outside: the text of 4107 explicitly excluded it.
Why the Commission is taking leather out of the deforestation regulation
Recital 5 of the delegated act gives four reasons, and they are worth reading together because none of them stands alone:
- The leather value chain separates early from the meat value chain. These are distinct downstream stages, with distinct operators.
- Trade flows for meat and for hides are asymmetric. They do not travel together or to the same destinations.
- The economic value of hides is low compared with meat within total cattle production.
- The consequence of the three above: EU operators have limited leverage to obtain from their suppliers the information the EUDR requires. It is not unwillingness, it is a lack of commercial leverage.
There is a fifth reason, about coherence: because processed leather goods (footwear, leather goods, upholstery) were never inside Annex I, keeping only the hides created a fragmented and incoherent approach for the whole sector. The Commission warns this could cause relocation of deforestation risk rather than its elimination: the hide enters through another door, already processed, and the problem is not solved but moved.
⚖️ The nuance almost nobody will report
The staff working document accompanying the delegated act acknowledges that keeping leather inside the EUDR carried significant environmental benefits against relatively low compliance costs. The Commission is not saying leather does not matter environmentally: it is saying supply chain considerations and the load on the information system weigh more. This is a feasibility decision, not an impact one. And the public consultation was divided on this specific point.
What does not change: cattle stays in, with wider scope
This is where the headline misleads. The same delegated act that removes leather widens the cattle scope in two places:
| Change | Before | Now | Applicable from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live bovine animals | 0102 21 and 0102 29 (two codes) | ex 0102 — the whole heading | 18 Sep 2026 |
| Bovine tongues | Fresh or chilled only (ex 0206 10) | Frozen tongues added (ex 0206 21 00) | 30 Dec 2027 |
The reasoning behind tongues is the same coherence logic in reverse: leaving frozen tongues out while fresh ones were in created a fragmented approach and an easy circumvention route.
⚠️ The net result is not «less EUDR»
For a cattle business this means less EUDR on hides and more EUDR on live animals and offal. Anyone reading only the headline will take away the opposite.
Is the removal permanent?
No. Recital 2 states it explicitly: bovine hides and skins and their derived products will be part of the 2030 general review foreseen in Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115. Until then, the Commission will keep monitoring the products affected by these Annex I amendments.
Translated into business decisions: companies building hide traceability should not dismantle it. They should put it in maintenance mode.
The other changes in the same delegated act
This is not only about leather. The act touches several commodities at once:
| Product | What happens | Applicable from |
|---|---|---|
Coffee extracts and concentrates (2101 11 00) — instant coffee | Added to Annex I | 30 Dec 2027 |
Soap (3401 11 00 and 3401 20) | Added to Annex I | 30 Dec 2027 |
Cocoa shells and waste (1802) | Waste as defined in Directive 2008/98/EC is excluded | 18 Sep 2026 |
Bovine hides and leather (ex 4101, ex 4104, ex 4107) | Removed from Annex I | 18 Sep 2026 |
The full code-by-code breakdown of the act, including palm derivatives and the timber and soy clarifications, is in our complete guide to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/2102.
Key takeaways
- Headings ex 4101, ex 4104 and ex 4107 (bovine hides and skins) left EUDR Annex I on 18 September 2026.
- There is no transition period: from that date no due diligence statement is required for those products.
- 4114 was never in scope, and neither were footwear and leather goods: that asymmetry is one of the reasons for the removal.
- The official rationale is supply chain feasibility, not environmental impact: the staff working document acknowledges the environmental benefit forgone.
- Cattle scope widens: the whole
ex 0102heading from 18 Sep 2026 and frozen tonguesex 0206 21 00from 30 Dec 2027. - The removal is not permanent: leather is included in the 2030 general review under Article 34(2).
- General EUDR dates are unchanged: 30 December 2026 for medium and large companies.
What to do now, depending on who you are
- If you import bovine hides or skins into the EU. From 18 September 2026 you no longer need a due diligence statement for those headings. Review statements already filed and those in preparation, and confirm the exact tariff classification of what you import: the exemption covers 4101, 4104 and 4107, not the whole of Chapter 41. If the code is unclear, requesting binding tariff information before you stop declaring is recommended.
- If you work with beef, offal or live cattle. The leather removal does not affect you; the widening does. Check whether you handle frozen tongues and prepare heading
ex 0206 21 00for 30 December 2027, and make sure your live animal scope covers the wholeex 0102heading, not just the two former codes. - If you are a non-EU exporter. If you were shipping hides to Europe, your customers will stop asking for geolocation on those headings. If you export cattle or beef, they will ask for the same or more.
- In every case. Keep the documentation for statements already filed, and do not dismantle any hide traceability you have built: the 2030 review may bring leather back onto the list.
Keeping scope current heading by heading, and knowing at any moment which product needs a statement and which does not, is exactly the kind of control that becomes unmanageable in a spreadsheet. At Coolx we centralise suppliers, geolocation data and documentation, and we generate and submit due diligence statements to TRACES from a single system. If you want to see how your scope looks after this change, get in touch with our team.
Frequently asked questions
Is leather out of EUDR scope right now?
Yes, from the day after publication of the delegated act in the Official Journal, 18 September 2026. There is no transition period.
Does this affect footwear and leather goods?
Nothing changes for them, because processed leather products were never in Annex I. That asymmetry is precisely one of the reasons for the removal.
What about leather that is not bovine?
The three deleted entries refer expressly to hides and skins of bovine animals. The EUDR covers seven commodities and leather from other species was not included as such in those headings.
Do I have to withdraw due diligence statements already filed for hides?
There is no obligation to withdraw them. Keep them as documentation; the EUDR maintains record-keeping duties for five years for submitted statements.
Could leather come back into scope?
Yes. It is expressly included in the 2030 general review under Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115.
Sources
Need help with your EUDR compliance?
Talk to an expert and find out how Coolx can help you comply before December 2026.
Talk to an EUDR expert